An Introduction to Asian
Parliamentary Debate
In Asian Parliamentary Style, there are 2 teams.
They are Government and
Opposition. Each team has 3 members and each team gives 4 speeches. The format
is a limited preparation format, meaning that the topic is announced, depending
on the tournament, roughly 30 minutes before the debate.
The 3 members of the Government should defend the
motion. The 3 members of the team, each of which gives a 7 minutes speech, are:
1.
Prime Minister
2.
Deputy Prime Minister
3.
Government Whip
One speaker from the Government team - either the
Prime Minister or Deputy Prime Minister - is charged with giving a 4 minutes
reply speech that clarifies the debate from the Government perspective without
bringing forth new arguments.
The 3 members of the Opposition team should negate
the motion and refute arguments brought forth by the Government. The 3 members
of the team, each of which gives a 7 minutes speech, are:
1.
Leader of Opposition
2.
Deputy Leader of
Opposition
3.
Opposition Whip
Like the Government team, one
speaker from the Opposition team - either the Leader of Opposition or Deputy
Leader of Opposition - is charged with giving a 4 minute reply speech that
clarifies the debate from the Opposition perspective without bringing forth new
arguments.
In the 7 minute speeches, the
opposing team can stand up and ask for Points of Information (POI) after the
first minute and until the sixth minute. A POI should be a brief question or
comment and not a long-winded monologue or back and forth cross examination
session.
This is what the debate looks like:
Times and Order of
Asian Parliamentary Debate Speeches
1.
Prime Minister - 7
minutes
2.
Leader of Opposition -
7 minutes
3.
Deputy Prime Minister
- 7 minutes
4.
Deputy Leader of
Opposition - 7 minutes
5.
Government Whip - 7
minutes
6.
Opposition Whip - 7
minutes
7.
Opposition Reply
Speech - 4 minutes
8.
Government Reply
Speech - 4 minutes
Speaker Roles in Asian
Parliamentary Debate
Government: Prime Minister (PM)
1.
Define context and
parameters of debate. For example, in an open motion like "This House
Would Support Musicians", the debate could be contextualized into whether
music should be a commodity for trade, or it should be available gratis (i.e.
free music download and transfer)
2.
Provide concise
background or history leading to the issue
3.
Give framework of
government bench's case. I.e. mechanisms (if any), argumentation flow (what the
government's first argument is and what the Deputy Prime Minister will talk
about)
4.
Introduce 1st argument
5.
Assert Government
stand
Government: Deputy Prime Minister
(DPM)
1.
Rebut first argument
from Leader of Opposition
2.
Rebut rebuttals to
PM's argument
3.
Introduce 2nd and 3rd
argument
4.
Reassert Government
stand and case
Government: Government Whip
1.
Rebut Deputy Leader of
Opposition, and Leader of Opposition
2.
Rebut rebuttals to DPM
and PM arguments
3.
Provide a deeper level
of analysis for previous arguments and rebuttals
4.
No new arguments, but
new angles of arguments should be given
5.
Brief summary of
entire case of Government
6.
Reassert Government
stand and case
Opposition: Leader of Opposition
1.
Agree or disagree with
context/ parameters of debate (any definitional challenges, accusations of
squirreling, or unfair set up should be made from the LO speech and no later)
2.
Rebut Prime Minister's
argument
3.
Give framework for
Opposition case (if Opp agrees to problem, then their case should provide
solution, or at least effectively highlight how Government proposal will worsen
the situation)
4.
Introduce first
Opposition argument
5.
Assert Opposition
stand
Opposition: Deputy Leader of
Opposition
1.
Rebut DPM and PM
arguments
2.
Rebut rebuttals to LO
arguments
3.
Introduce 1st and 2nd
(if any) argument
4.
Reassert Opposition
stand and case
Opposition: Opposition Whip
1.
Rebut DPM and PM
arguments
2.
Rebut rebuttals to LO
& DLO arguments
3.
Provide a deeper level
of analysis for previous arguments and rebuttals
4.
No new arguments, but
new angles of arguments should be given
5.
Reassert Opposition
stand and case
Reply Speech:
1.
Can only be done by
either 1st or 2nd speaker from each bench
2.
Provide a biased 'oral
adjudication' of why the debate should go to own bench
3.
Highlight issues you
think your side won, carefully tiptoe around issues you think you lost
4.
New examples to expand
on discussed examples is usually allowed and makes the reply speech sound fresh
as opposed to verbal regurgitation
5.
Reassert stand
6.
Most importantly, try
to have fun while you're doing all this. ;)
Strategies & Tips
for Limited Preparation Debating
1.
Read Widely
Even just skimming a
few international news websites, like BBC news, Al Jazeera or The New York
Times will help keep you abreast of international issues. If you have a
computer, set one of these sites as your homepage so that global issues
"sink in" each time you open your browser. A great weekly read for
sheer breadth is the The Economist.
2.
Research Timely Issues
If there is an issue
that is dominating the news and you have a debate tournament coming up, you can
be sure that there will be a motion on that topic. Split tasks with your
partners and teammates and create briefs on these issues before the tournament
so that everyone can be up to speed. Keep these briefs throughout the year so
that you can update them as events change.
3.
Research Key Countries
and Organizations
Some countries are
global players and will enter nearly any international debate in which you find
yourself. Being even passingly familiar with the political structures and
current situations of these countries - or groups of countries - can help you
win debates. Some good places to start are: China, the US, Russia, the EU and
Japan. International organizations, especially the UN, feature prominently in
many debates as well. Knowing the decision-making machinery of these
organizations, their jurisdiction and their activities will help you immensely.
In addition to the UN, you may want to look into NATO, ASEAN, the WTO and the
G8.
4.
Use IDEA's Free
Resources
Debatepedia (the wiki
you are on right now) is a free resource open to anyone with internet access.
It is a great place to get a sense of an issue and begin constructing
arguments. You may want to dig deeper into important events and controversies,
but with thousands of articles, Debatepedia is a good place to start.
0 Comments