MOTION #9: THIS HOUSE BELIEVES
THAT CHILDREN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO OWN AND USE MOBILE PHONES
The United Nations estimates that there are currently as many as 4.1
billion active mobile phone subscriptions. Modern mobile phones can perform a
wide variety of functions, such as taking and sending photographs and video,
playing music and games, and surfing the internet and accessing social
networks. Their main use, however, remains for voice calls and for texting
short messages. As prices of both phones and calls have come down in the past
ten years or so with increased competition, they have become much more
affordable for young people. This has raised questions about whether children
should own phones, and if they should be allowed to take them into school.
Schools in different countries, and within countries, take very different views
on this issue. In many European schools, especially in Scandinavia, mobile
phone technologies are actively used in education and to communication with
students. Other schools allow them to be
carried, but say they must never be turned on in school hours. Some (for
example, New York schools) ban them entirely. Proponents of children being
given mobile phones argue that they keep them safe, within reach of their
parents at all times and are essential for maintaining friendships and social
cohesion, whilst opponents maintain that they are susceptible to abuse and do
not have the best interests of the child at heart.
Pros
|
Cons
|
Mobile phones keep children safe. Mobile phones keep children safer, as it is easier for
parents to stay in touch with their children and for children to contact
someone in an emergency. Through calls and texts, parents can know where
their child is and be reassured that he or she is safe, all the while their
children know they are never more than a phone call away from help. As Leslie
Sharpe argues, ‘I wanted to ensure that they had a way of contacting me in an
emergency’. It is, however, true that some children carrying the most sophisticated
or ‘Smart’ phones are more susceptible to being robbed, but thieves are
always after something new. Phones now are both much more widespread and
security coded, so the benefits to thieves are no longer as great or
immediate. Traffic accidents that are the result of children being distracted
by their phones while walking across roads should be blamed on bad safety
education rather than on the actual phones. Ultimately, mobile phones provide
parents and young people with peace of mind and children with a safety net in
emergencies, whether calling parents or the emergency services.
|
The ostensible goal of keeping children safe is
neglected if the device is at the mercy of whoever holds it. The link between
parents and children that phones ostensibly provide is easily broken if, as
Janet Bodnar notes, “your child doesn’t want to be reached, she can always
turn off the phone and plead the ‘no service’ defence”. Not to mention the
fact that children, with phones, who miss calls or fail to call their parents
causing more stress and worry than others who don’t carry phones with them.
Phones give parents a reason to be concerned if not used. Furthermore, any
person who does not want a child to reach their parents can easily take it
off them before they are able to use it. True safety is provided by maturity
and good parenting and good communication not a phone line.
|
Children should be comfortable with modern technology. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is now
a normal part of modern life, used by everyone from toddlers to pensioners.
So children need to grow up making use of technology such as mobile phones if
they are to be able to fully participate in contemporary society. The average
age at which children get their first mobile phone is eight according to a
recent study. To prevent a child from having a mobile phone at that age is to
put them at a clear social disadvantage compared with their peers. Mobile
phone use develops skills for the modern workplace with its need for
tech-savvy employees with communication skills and the ability to work
flexibly. In any case, children often have better phone manners than adults –
they are less likely to shout into the phone, more likely to text discreetly,
and more aware of text and phone etiquette. Such manners are the direct
consequence of familiarity with the device and an understanding of
appropriate use in certain contexts.
|
Children should not be comfortable with modern
technology, merely the modern world. Mobile phones are a distraction from the
real world, having a negative impact on children interacting with those
around them. A survey of 1,500 parents found that ‘more than three quarters
said that technology has had a negative effect on family life and a third
said they ban mobile phones from the dinner table’. Furthermore, a survey of
American teenagers in 2009 found that whilst 51% of respondents talk to their
friends on their cell phone every day, only 29% spend time with friends in
person doing activities outside of school. This probably reflects wider
social changes as the outside world is perceived as risky. Constant talking,
texting, and games playing take the place of proper socialising. Young people
grow up without good manners, unable to relate to those around them in a
normal way. Parents, anxious that their traditional role as the shoulder to
lean on is being superseded by friends and access to the internet, are
increasingly turning to spying on their children. The mutual distrust,
fuelled by access to modern technology, is not a positive development.
|
Mobile phones encourage the development of independence
and interpersonal skills. Education is as much
about the growth in character and dealing with risks as it is the
accumulation of knowledge; mobile phones provide for children a means to
converse with peers, develop friendships and resolve disputes, all within
minutes of each other, night and day. For them, ‘getting a cell phone is a
step towards independence and a status symbol among their friends’. The
confidence and self-esteem derived from having a mobile phone cannot be
underappreciated, as proven by the corresponding negative impact of losing
one’s phone. An Independent study in 2004 found that 55 per cent of people
cited ‘keeping in touch with friends or family as the main reason for being
wedded to their handsets'. Furthermore, the increasing potential of smart
phones facilitates the accessing of information in real-time and on the move;
a determined child with a grasp of the potential of their mobile phone can
illuminate themselves on matters like directions to destinations, opening
times for activities and immediate weather forecasts. With such information,
children can begin to reason with each other and make decisions without
resort to more mature advice.
|
Independence is by its very nature unsupervised,
therefore, the only way parents know how mobiles are being used is to be told
by often shy teenagers. In some cases, this has led to sex offenders being
able to ‘hide behind the anonymity’ of chat rooms and phone numbers and
develop relationships with young children. This would be less of a problem if
children were aware of the dangers. However a recent Taiwanese study found
that though 43% of parents were worried that their kids would meet strangers
online, only 10% of children were similarly concerned. The true extent of
online grooming remains unknown. There are ways of encouraging independence
without risking exploitation in new media environments; however, honest
discussions and responsible education can ameliorate some of these risks.
|
Schools can implement programs to encourage responsible
and considerate mobile phone use. All technological platforms have the potential to be abused or act as a
negative medium, what is important is that children are taught to use their
mobile phones responsibly. Schools should introduce programs and classes that
teach children not only how important the devices are to their personal
safety, but also how to exploit the advantages of the software. All children
with sufficiently smart mobile phones should know how to find out where they
are at any given time using map functions, and how to use the internet to
find information on the go but to be vary of revealing their location to
others and possible commercial exploitation of certain location based
services. This advice should be taught alongside warnings about the limits of
mobile phone technology, ensuring that the children don’t trust them blindly
but use them as verification tools or means of starting enquiries. What
should emerge is an environment where phones can be used as teaching tools
and facilitating social cohesion rather than simply being a distraction in
class.
|
|
Mobile phones are medically safe for children to use –
we should ignore scare stories in the media. The latest research has not
proved that mobile phones damage brain cells. Ed Yong, head of health
information at Cancer Research UK, said ‘the risk of brain cancer is similar
in people who use mobile phones compared to those who don’t, and rates of
this cancer (glioma) have not gone up in recent years despite a dramatic rise
in phone use during the 1980s’. Furthermore, the European Union’s public
health body concluded in 2008 that ‘mobile phone use for less than ten years
is not associated with cancer incidence. Regarding longer use, it was deemed
difficult to make an estimate’. Even those earlier studies that suggested
there might be a problem thought that people would have to use a cell phone
for hours a day for there to be an effect. It is true that there is no 100%
proof that mobile phones are safe to use, but that is true of any scientific
study. Further investigation should be encouraged, but without conclusive
proof, the benefits of mobile phone use will continue to far outweigh the
costs.
|
There are long-term health risks to mobile phone use. There are possible potential long-term health risks
from using mobile phones. In May 2011, the World Health Organisation
classified the radiation emitted by handsets as ‘possibly carcinogenic’. It
has been widely accepted that the radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
emitted by mobile phones are absorbed into the body, ‘much of it by the head
when the headset is held to the air’. Because children’s brains are still
developing, any possible damage to them is even more worrying than for
adults. It is true there is no total scientific proof about this, but it is
better to play safe than take risks – the precautionary principle. Until
science can prove mobile phones are completely safe for young people to use,
they should not be allowed to have them. As Christopher Wild, who headed a
study into the health risks of mobile use, instructed, ‘it is important to
take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands-free devices or
texting’. The damage, despite not being conclusive, is potentially serious
enough to warrant caution and prevent children being unnecessarily exposed.
|
Mobile phones are not too expensive for children –
children use pocket money to buy credit and often inherit ‘hand-me-down’
handsets initially. As noted by the opposition, basic models are cheap and
the subscription itself is at the mercy of the buyer. Parents can always say “no”
or set limits on what the children can spend. With modern payment plans
children can be given a set amount of credit for calls and texts. Learning to
work within financial limits is an important part of growing up. In any case,
many young people have part-time jobs so they are spending their own money,
not their parents and learning to control use and financially managing phone
use is a very good skill to learn.
Nevertheless, even if it were the case that mobile phones are too expensive,
that does not render their ability to keep children safe negligible, for one
cannot place a price on a child’s safety.
|
Mobile phones are too expensive for children. Mobile phones are too expensive for children. Even if
basic models are cheap to buy, calls are expensive and charges soon mount up
because ‘what kids really want to do is text-message their friends, download
music or play games’. Many young people run up big bills their parents have
to pay. A few rich families might be able to afford this, but for many
parents the hours their kids spend on their cell phones are an uncontrollable
expense they cannot cope with. Others are under peer pressure to get the
newest, most stylish phones with all the latest gadgets.
Banning mobile phones would at least partially reduce
the financial strain on poorer families.
|
Mobile phones are now a valuable part of student life.
They can be used for ‘creating short movies, setting homework reminders,
recording a teacher reading a poem and timing science experiments’. Moreover,
because parents feel their children are safer carrying a phone, they are more
likely to allow them to travel to school on their own rather than driving
them. This promotes greater independence for the children, while taking
traffic off the roads which is environmentally-friendly. Like many other
things, mobiles can be distracting in class but this doesn’t mean they should
be banned. Many schools allow – some actively encourage - phones to be
carried providing they are turned off in lesson.
|
Mobile phones are inappropriate distractions in school. Mobile phones are inappropriate in schools. They take
students’ attention away from their lessons and undermine discipline. Rules
about having them turned off in lessons are impossible to enforce – students
just put them in silent mode and secretly text or play games in the back of
the class. There have been many cases of students using mobiles to cheat in
tests, in 2005 60% of cases involving taking unauthorized items into exam
rooms involved mobile phones, and some of students recording embarrassing
footage of their teachers to post on the internet. Schools are for learning
and anything which gets in the way of that should be banned.
|
Anything can be abused or used to harm other person,
including pencils and paper. New technology carries some risks but we should
not be rushed into panic measures. Children got hold of pornography, gambled
and bullied each other long before mobile phones were invented. The
relationship between childhood and new mobile technologies is complex. These
problems won’t go away if we ban phone use – they can only be dealt with
through good parenting and moral education.
In the meantime, parents can get phones which block inappropriate
content, and ensure that their children do not have credit cards to pay for
it. They should make sure that children know how to report abuse or what to
do if they receive inappropriate material on the phone. An American company
Disney Mobile is also one of an increasing number of phone makers who
‘provides families with mobile phones specifically designed for tweens, young
teens and parents who want to keep an eye on them’. The potential for the
abuse of mobile phones is low if parents are informed and vigilant and ensure
they buy their children the right phone and right plan.
|
Mobile phones are open to abuse. Mobile phones are open to abuse, offering activities
which are very inappropriate for children. The ability of modern phones to
display graphics has led to the rise of mobile pornography, sexting, gambling
and cyber-bullying. Most parents restrict their children’s television viewing
and computer use, but it is much harder for them to monitor mobile phone use.
In 2004, British mobile phone operators, in an effort to combat mobile abuse,
enacted regulation that prevents children purchasing phones with unlimited
internet access. Though this demonstrates a problem has been identified, the
solution does not address phones bought by parents for their children or
children who already own phones with unlimited internet access. Given this,
it is best that children are not allowed to own them.
|
0 Comments